Campaigners “very disappointed” by decision to close Lowestoft Magistrates’ Court
- Credit: Nick Butcher
Lowestoft Magistrates' Court is to close - despite a compelling case being made to keep it open.
The Ministry of Justice announced yesterday (Thursday, February 11) that the building in Old Nelson Street, Lowestoft would be shut to save money following a nationwide review of the court estate.
In a conversation with Waveney MP Peter Aldous on the day of the announcement, justice minister Shailesh Vara indicated that the court's utilisation rate - which the MoJ says is 26 per cent - meant it was not a viable option to keep open.
'The decision to close a court is never taken lightly, but in the digital age I am confident we have measures in place to ensure access to justice is not diminished,' Mr Vara said.
However Mr Aldous said he had expressed his concern at the decision to Mr Vara.
You may also want to watch:
'I'm very disappointed by this decision,' Mr Aldous said.
'I believe the case that was put together by local users of the court for it to remain open was compelling.
- 1 Pub ordered to pay £23.5k compensation to sacked disabled worker
- 2 Friends launch fantasy horse racing site to combat problem gambling
- 3 Relief for kittiwakes as controversial netting removed
- 4 Lowestoft man badly hurt after being attacked by gang in his own home
- 5 Man released from hospital after being stabbed in Lowestoft
- 6 Have your say on plans for 150 homes at former hospital site
- 7 Pakefield Man set for summer showcase
- 8 Green light for new shop's alcohol bid
- 9 Lockdown easing to go ahead - but Hancock won't rule out reversal
- 10 Diversions in place with stretch of A12 to be closed overnight
'With a big emphasis at the moment on localism and devolution, I believe the views of local people should be given high priority.'
Mr Aldous believes the decision will have a big impact on justice in the area.
'The magistrates' court serves a specific area and a specific community. They will find it more difficult to get to alternative courts. In that respect, I'm concerned about this because I think it's the wrong approach.'
He added that he agreed videolink could work for smaller hearings that can be dealt with relatively quickly - but said it was important that people are present in court for most hearings.
Rob Barley - from Norton Peskett solicitors in Lowestoft, who submitted a counter proposal to the closure as part of the MoJ's official consultation - said the closure could 'undoubtedly have the potential to impact people's willingness to attend court'.
He added: 'The real sadness about Lowestoft is that it is an excellent facility. It had an excellent connection to the police station, was conveniently located and had all the facilities it need. I still think the facilities are better than Great Yarmouth.'
What do you think about the decision to close Lowestoft Magistrates' Court? Write, giving your full contact details, to: Journal Postbox, 147 London Road North, Lowestoft NR32 1NB or email firstname.lastname@example.org