Search

Criticism over local government review

PUBLISHED: 04:26 17 January 2009 | UPDATED: 22:13 05 July 2010

THE Boundary Committee has been slammed for the high cost of the review into reorganising local government in Suffolk after it emerged taxpayers are footing a £5,000 a week bill.

THE Boundary Committee has been slammed for the high cost of the review into reorganising local government in Suffolk after it emerged taxpayers are footing a £5,000 a week bill.

The review - which is looking at creating a new system of councils in the county - has cost £218,757 since March last year, according to figures given to the House of Commons.

That figure - which includes nearly £28,000 on consultation and £65,000 for financial experts - will rise when the committee presents its final proposals to the government next month.

One Suffolk MP called the review “a completely absurd exercise” and urged the government to leave the current system as it is.

And the Tax Payers' Alliance said the cost would be hard to bear - especially given the current economic climate.

Last year, ministers pulled the plug on previously approved proposals to make Ipswich a stand-alone unitary council, which would have left the rest of Suffolk administered by the county council and six district authorities.

In its place, the government ordered the Boundary Committee to draw up plans to introduce unitary councils in Suffolk, Norfolk and Devon.

The Committee has proposed that Suffolk be split in three - a council responsible for Ipswich and Felixstowe, Lowestoft to join a super Norfolk unitary, and the rest of Suffolk forming a rural unitary likely to be based at Bury St Edmunds.

In answer to a question from West Suffolk Conservative MP Richard Spring, Peter Viggers - who speaks in the Commons for the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission - said the review in Suffolk had cost £218,757 since March last year.

Salaries account for £109,948, consultants fees £27,483, the bill for financial consultants £65,791, printing £11,794, mapping £2,248, couriers £363, and staff training £1,130.

Mr Spring said: “This is a completely absurd exercise. Previous local government reorganisations have seen no improvement or money saving for council tax payers. The government should leave well alone.

“The Conservatives have said we do not favour any change. A huge change in local government should not be contemplated with 17 months to go before a general election, after which the plans might be abandoned.”

Mark Wallace, campaign director of the Tax Payers' Alliance, said: “This is a large bill for tax payers to bear - particularly when we are all suffering from a recession.

“We are always told that the government and councils pay such high salaries because they have excellent staff. If this is the case then why is there a need to bring in such costly consultants?”

Communities secretary Hazel Blears is waiting for the Boundary Committee's final report, due to be published by February 13. She will have to decide whether to give the go-ahead in time for June's county council elections or whether to delay polling to allow the Electoral Commission to draw up new ward boundaries.


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Lowestoft Journal. Click the link in the yellow box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Lowestoft Journal