Kessingland man must keep dog on lead court orders
A KESSINGLAND man was this week landed with a �135 bill and ordered to keep his dog on a lead at all times in public after magistrates were told how it had injured a woman for a second time.
Andrew Whittaker, 47, of McLean Drive, was given the dog control order after Lowestoft Magistrates' Court heard about two incidents involving his dog Millie, a black and tan terrier.
The woman was out walking her own small dog in Wash Lane, Kessingland, on September 10 when Mollie – off her leash at the time – approached her, scratching her on the back of her leg.
The court was told the incident came just over a month after Millie had bitten the same woman.
After the August incident, Whittaker, a part-time chef at the Tramways pub in Pakefield, had signed a community resolution notice stating that he would keep his dog on a lead in public.
You may also want to watch:
However, the court heard that when interviewed by police after the second incident, Whittaker admitted he had never intended to keep his dog on a lead and had only signed the notice to avoid being arrested.
Lesla Small, prosecuting, said the second incident happened because Millie was not on a leash.
- 1 'Complete shock' - Neighbours stunned after cannabis farm uncovered
- 2 Driver convicted of killing friend in A12 crash
- 3 New owners of popular park café set out vision for 'beautiful' venue
- 4 Norfolk and Suffolk Elections 2021: LIVE Results
- 5 Tributes to high street mechanic known as a 'local legend'
- 6 Heartbreak as netting traps and entangles endangered bird species
- 7 Cornish man in search for long lost Lowestoft relatives
- 8 Suffolk elections 2021: When to expect results
- 9 Man, 22, charged over stabbing as victim remains 'critical'
- 10 New convenience store earmarked for former Boots pharmacy
This meant she was able to run across the road to where the woman was walking. 'The dog has then gone and caused a minor scratch to the back area of the victim and would not go away,' she said.
Whittaker admitted being the owner of a dog that was dangerously out of control in a public place, causing an injury.
James Hartley, mitigating, told the court that Whittaker believed he could keep his dog under control without having her on a lead and normally only used it as a form of punishment. In regard to the September incident, Mr Hartley added: 'He felt it (the dog) was being friendly. It was not dangerously out of control.'
However, Whittaker now accepted his attitude on dogs being on a lead was 'wrong' and he was 'apologetic'.
Mr Hartley asked magistrates if Millie could be kept off a lead to run on Kessingland beach or on Beccles Common.
However, they rejected this request and ordered the dog be kept on a lead at all times in public places.
Whittaker was also ordered to pay �50 compensation to the woman for her scratch injury and �85 costs.