Search

Lowestoft 'must stay in Suffolk'

PUBLISHED: 10:31 04 September 2008 | UPDATED: 21:11 05 July 2010

ONE of Suffolk's most influential organisations has voiced strong support for a single unitary county if the go-ahead is given to a radical overhaul of local government.

ONE of Suffolk's most influential organisations has voiced strong support for a single unitary county if the go-ahead is given to a radical overhaul of local government.

Suffolk Association of Voluntary Organisations (SAVO), whose members include charities and social groups, is also opposing Lowestoft's inclusion in a hybrid Norfolk unitary, a move proposed by the Boundary Committee for England as part of a shake-up of the current county and district councils.

The committee is consulting the public on its original proposals - two “super councils” in Suffolk based on Ipswich-Felixstowe and a rural country unitary plus one giant Norfolk single county which would also absorb Lowestoft.

Jonathan Moore, SAVO's chief executive, said: “Dividing rural from urban and lopping off Lowestoft runs counter to Suffolk's sense of place, culture and history.”

He added: “The county of Suffolk is a logical and workable for both strategy and delivery.”

In a strongly-worded leading article in this month's SAVO newsletter, editor Robin Hodgkinson says: “The chances are we will end up with a structure that no-one, except Whitehall, wants.

“The only people who will really benefit from the boundary changes are the marketing companies and printers employed to design and print new logos, slogans, letterheads and business cards.”

SAVO says the proposed shake-up, which follows the Government's instructions to the Boundary Committee to come up with “unitary solutions for Suffolk and Norfolk,” could affect funding for charities and social volunteer groups.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Lowestoft Journal

Hot Jobs

Show Job Lists