Record office closure to be scrutinised in joint council meeting

Lowestoft library and record office. Picture: Nick Butcher

Lowestoft library and record office. Picture: Nick Butcher - Credit: Nick Butcher

Suffolk County Council's decision to close the Lowestoft Record Office will come under renewed scrutiny after a deal was struck at a council meeting.

Mark Bee, leader of Waveney District Council. Picture: Suffolk County Council

Mark Bee, leader of Waveney District Council. Picture: Suffolk County Council - Credit: Archant

At Waveney District Council's full council meeting on Tuesday, July 18, Conservative council leader Mark Bee agreed to organise a joint scrutiny meeting between the two councils.

The move came after Malcolm Cherry, Labour councillor for St Margaret's, put forward a motion calling for the closure date of the records office to be postponed until an alternative site had been found.

The decision to close the record office has been criticised by campaign groups, with more than 7,000 people signing a petition calling on Suffolk County Council to reverse the decision.

The new scrutiny committee will be chaired by Alison Cackett, chairman of Waveney's Scrutiny Committee, and will be held in Lowestoft.

You may also want to watch:

Mr Bee, who also chairs Suffolk County Council's scrutiny committee in his role as a county councillor, promised members of the public, stakeholders, and campaign groups such as Save Our Record Office would be welcome to put questions to the committee.

He added the decision would allow for the whole decision making process and the governance behind the closure to be examined in full detail.

Most Read

During the meeting, Labour group leader Peter Byatt, who supported the deal, said: 'It would be a betrayal of our trust in the administration of this council if it doesn't happen.'

Mr Bee responded: 'You can have my absolute assurance that this will be done as quickly as possible. This is not a delaying process.'

He added after the meeting: 'I suggested way back that it should go to scrutiny and it was accepted there should be a role for scrutiny because there are clearly lessons to be learnt from the way that this has been handled.

'Let's do it properly, but let's not do it so it drags on. We will do it as soon as we can properly do it.'

Mr Byatt added: 'This Joint Scrutiny meeting will now give members of the public the opportunity of presenting their views directly to councillors, and having their voices heard, something which has been lacking in the whole process.'

The original motion proposed by Mr Cherry was withdrawn as part of the deal.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter