Teachers back bid to axe exams
TEACHERS in Suffolk today threw their weight behind a campaign to scrap controversial exams.The National Union of Teachers (NUT) has voted unanimously in favour of industrial action over SATS tests for seven and 11-year-olds over the weekend.
TEACHERS in Suffolk today threw their weight behind a campaign to scrap controversial exams.
The National Union of Teachers (NUT) has voted unanimously in favour of industrial action over SATS tests for seven and 11-year-olds over the weekend.
The union could now hold a ballot in the autumn term and industrial action would follow next year if the ballot was successful.
The motion, which children's secretary Ed Balls claims would be illegal, could mean teachers refuse to prepare or invigilate for the exams next year.
You may also want to watch:
Speaking from the NUT's annual conference in Cardiff yesterday, Graham White, division secretary for Suffolk NUT, said: 'We have always been opposed to SATS and think the government should abolish them.
'SATS tell you nothing that teachers can't tell pupils and parents alike.'
- 1 Five new businesses to discover in Lowestoft as lockdown eases
- 2 'One crazy decision' - Mother's anguish over son's death as dealer jailed
- 3 Sergeant reveals what's in store for new TV show with Suffolk police team
- 4 Smokehouse to be showcased on BBC One’s Antiques Road Trip
- 5 Police thank public after tracing Lowestoft woman
- 6 Driver flees after crashing into level crossing
- 7 7 outdoor events happening in Norfolk and Waveney this weekend
- 8 Boy attacked by man in woodland in Lowestoft
- 9 'Lucky number seven' - Landlord opens 'flagship' pub in hometown
- 10 Road to be closed and traffic diverted for a week
He also claimed these so-called 'drill and kill' tests were having an adverse affect on children's health.
The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) announced that its lawyers said headteachers had a statutory duty to administer the tests, and to not do so would be unlawful.
This could affect the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) which is to put an identical motion before its members at its annual conference next month.
A DCSF spokesman said: 'The motion proposed by the NUT leadership calling for a boycott of next year's statutory tests is irresponsible, it is unlawful and it is out of touch with what parents and teachers want. They should think again.'
But NUT general secretary Christine Blower said she still had some hope that the government would scrap the tests and action could be avoided.
The expert group, set up by the government last year to look at the tests for 11-year-olds in English, maths and science, is due to report back in a few weeks.
Speaking earlier this week, Mr Balls said the current system was not set in stone and that he would be 'surprised' if the expert group said it could not be improved.