Search

Unitary Status

PUBLISHED: 11:38 24 December 2007 | UPDATED: 19:20 05 July 2010

YES, Stephen Chilvers is right to call himself a miserable, unreconstructed cynic.

The whole point about having a unitary council is that it will benefit all the people of Lowestoft, not just one party or another.

YES, Stephen Chilvers is right to call himself a miserable, unreconstructed cynic.

The whole point about having a unitary council is that it will benefit all the people of Lowestoft, not just one party or another.

Who does he want to make decisions for Lowestoft?

People from Kersey, Debenham, Hoxne and Pakenham are not just miles away geographically, they have no interest in or understanding of towns but it is them that make all the decisions that count in Lowestoft.

The county council has no cabinet councillors from Lowestoft. The same is true for Ipswich. That is why all the political parties were convinced that we wanted unitary status for Ipswich and why should Lowestoft be left out?

Any local politician who cares more about Lowestoft than about their narrow party-political line will be arguing for unitary status.

SANDY MARTIN

Councillor for Ipswich St Johns

Milton Street

Ipswich


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Lowestoft Journal. Click the link in the orange box above for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Latest from the Lowestoft Journal